Home | GIJNR

Peer Review Process

Our journal follows a double-blind peer-review process. All articles are reviewed by potential reviewers. The journal editorial team takes the final decision for the acceptance of the article after the rigorous review process.
After receipt of the manuscript from the authors, it passes through various stages. The submitted manuscript is judged by editorial team members for suitability for publication based on relevance, significance, and reader interest. The chief editor takes these factors into consideration after the initial screening.
Suitable manuscripts after the primary screening are checked for plagiarism and grammatical errors. Available software tools are used to detect plagiarized content and grammatical mistakes for better accuracy.
After successfully passing this step, the manuscript is sent for the double-blind review process. Reviewers submit a review report after critical analysis of the manuscript.
The review report and suggested modifications are analysed by editors and communicated to the chief editor for approval before publication in the journal.
The review report along with required modifications/corrections is communicated to the corresponding author so that the suggested changes can be incorporated into the manuscript.
After completion of the review process, authors are informed about the editorial decision and, if accepted, about the publication of the corrected manuscript along with the tentative publication date.
The review process ensures that the identity of reviewers remains confidential and is not disclosed to authors to maintain fair evaluation of the manuscript.
The editorial decision is final. The editorial board reserves the right to make revisions aimed at greater clarity or conformity of style.