Peer Review Process

• Our journal follows a double-blind peer-review process. All articles are reviewed by potential reviewers. Journal editorial team takes the final decision for the acceptance of the article after the rigorous review process.
• After receipt of the manuscript from the authors, it passes the following stage. The submitted manuscript will be judged by editorial team members for suitability for publication on the basis of relevance and significance of the article as well as interest to readers. The chief editor will take into consideration all these factors after the initial screening of the manuscript.
• Suitable manuscripts after the primary screening will be checked for plagiarism and grammatical errors. The use of available software to detect plagiarized content and grammatical errors in the manuscript ensures more accuracy in this process.
• After successfully passing this step, the manuscript will be sent for the double-blind review process. Reviewers will submit a review report after a critical analysis of the manuscript.
• Review report and any modifications will be analysed by editors and will be communicated to the chief editor for his / her approval for publishing in the journal.
• Review report with any modification/correction will be communicated to the corresponding author after the review process to make suggested changes in the manuscript.
• After the entire review process, authors will be communicated about the decision of the editorial team and if accepted, publication of the corrected manuscript in the journal and tentative date of publication.
• The whole review process ensures that the identity of reviewers is kept confidential and should not be revealed to authors to maintain a fair evaluation of the manuscript.
• The editorial decision is final. The editorial board reserves the right to make revisions aimed at greater clarity or conformity of style.

Suggestions for Reviewers

Reviewers are selected on the basis of experience in his/her area (minimum five years). Reviewers should strictly evaluate each article.

An original research article should have clearly defined sections e.g. Introduction, Methodology, Results/Observations (findings), and Discussion (conclusions and recommendations). Briefly describe, discuss and evaluate the key points involved in each section of the article.